• Bidadanure, J. (forthcoming 2021) Justice Across Ages: Treating Young and Old as Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Axelsen, D., Bidadanure, J. & Tim Meijers (2019) Luck Egalitarianism: Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen and His Critics. London: Routledge

Journal Articles

  • Bidadanure, J. 2019. “The Political Theory of Basic Income.” Annual Review of Political Science. -> See here.
  • Bidadanure, J. (with David V. Axelsen) online first “Unequally Egalitarian? Defending the Egalitarian Credentials of Social Egalitarianism”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. -> See latest draft here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2016. “Making Sense of Age-Group Justice: A Time for Relational Equality?” Philosophy, Politics & Economics 15(3) 234–260 -> See here. — The article was discussed on the blog PEA soup by Paul Bou-Habib, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, David Axelsen, Paula Casal, Martin O’Neill, Christian Schemmel and others.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2015.“On Dennis McKerlie’s Equality and Time.” Ethics – 125th Anniversary Issue, 125:4, 1174-1177 -> See here.
  • Bidadanure J. 2015. “Better Procedures for Fairer Outcomes:  Youth Quotas in Parliaments.” Intergenerational Justice Review, 2/15: 40-46. -> See here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2013. “In Defense of the Prudential Lifespan Account.” American Journal of Bioethics. 13:8, 25-27 -> See here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2012.“Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France.” Intergenerational Justice Review, 1/12: 22-28 -> See  here.

Book Chapters

  • Bidadanure, J. 2019. “Towards a Democratic Ethics of Youth Policies” in The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy, edited by Annabelle Lever and Andrei Poama. -> See latest draft here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2018. “Discrimination and Age” in The Routledge Handbook on the Ethics of Discrimination, edited by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Oxon: Routledge: 243-253 -> See latest draft here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2018. “The Challenge of Generational Inequalities for Democracy” in International Panel on Social Progress Chapter 14 – Inequality as a Challenge to Democracy. -> See full chapter here.
  • Bidadanure J. 2017. “Youth quotas, diversity and long-termism: can young people act as proxies for future generations?” in Institutions for Future Generations, edited by Axel Gosseries and Inigo Gonzales. Oxford: Oxford University Press-> See latest draft here.
  • Bidadanure J. 2015. “Better Procedures for Fairer Outcomes: Can Youth Quotas in Parliaments increase our Chances of Meeting the Demands of Intergenerational Justice.” in Youth Quotas and Other Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies, edited by Joerg Tremmel, et al. London: Springer. -> See here.

Other Publications:

  • Bidadanure, J. et al. 2018. “Basic Income in Cities.” Toolkit written in partnership with the National League of Cities -> See here.
  • Bidadanure, J. 2017. “Basic Income Convergence” Boston Review, Forum 2: 51-55 -> See here.

Work in Progress:

  • Social Inequality I: Infantilization”: When a person is infantilized, they are denied their maturity as an adult and treated as if they were a child. The wrongness of infantilization cannot be apprehended merely by looking at its effects and the harm it causes. Infantilization is a status diminisher: its wrongness also lies in its demeaning nature. Even if those forms of infantilization were not perceived as disrespectful and were not harmful to those subjected to it, we would still have good reasons to object to it.
  • “Social Inequality II: Demonization”: When an individual, or a group of individuals, are demonized, they are vilified as a wicked and devious threats to the community. Demonization denies the equal morality of the individuals subjected to it. Debasing vulnerable individuals as moral inferiors is a powerful mechanism of oppression and social exclusion. Despite its importance as a historical phenomenon, demonization has hardly been discussed by contemporary egalitarians.
  • “Towards an Ethics of Social Banditry”: This paper looks at cases of social bandits who stole from the rich to give to the poor, like the mythical figure of Robin Hood. The phenomenon has been widely researched by social historians but not by moral and political philosophers. While acknowledging that social banditry can undermine personal security, the rule of law, and democracy, I will ask when (if ever) social banditry might be permissible.